There are 3 messages totalling 63 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Episode Discussion: False Witness (3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 09:20:31 -0400 From: Deborah Clarke <dmclarke@i.......> Subject: Re: Episode Discussion: False Witness on 5/8/07 2:19 PM, Phillips, Tim at Tim.Phillips@s....... wrote: Even if he > didn't push it....Schanke did have an odor that something odd was going > on. If the character had stayed into Season 3...I think they would > have had to have him figure out Nick's secret (which I do not think > would have been a bad thing). I agree. If Schanke had known vampires existed outside his imagination he would have realized what Nick was. Debbie ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 09:21:55 -0400 From: Deborah Clarke <dmclarke@i.......> Subject: Re: Episode Discussion: False Witness > > 11) Nick doing his "superman flying number". I do not think it works > as well as the implied flight sequences. Implying flight was one of > those "lets be cheaper" moves that I think actually really works much > better then trying to show a vampire flying through the air. > I agree again. It also had the added benefit of suggesting speed. Debbie ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:02:59 +0200 From: P J <blue_twingo772@y.......> Subject: Re: Episode Discussion: False Witness From: Deborah Clarke: > The other thing that bothered me about this episode is the court made no effort to accomodate Nick's alleged allergy to the sun. < I guess, they just didn't think it was that severe. As Stonetree said, "We're not talking about a day at the beach". I always wondered if Nick gave in so easily because the events in the flashback bothered him or because he wanted to escape the sun rays that crept nearer. Petra. ------------------------------ End of FORKNI-L Digest - 11 May 2007 to 12 May 2007 (#2007-47) **************************************************************
Previous |
This month's list |
Next |