There are 2 messages totalling 44 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Some musings on the "whammy" (2) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:43:38 -0700 From: Walt Doherty <wdoherty5@c.......> Subject: Re: Some musings on the "whammy" Logical, straight-forward, believable. Walt D > As I've been watching FK again, I've been thinking about the practice of > the vampire "whammy". Here are a few thoughts. > > > Well, that's my two cents. What do you think? > >> Angela Gottfred > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:59:53 +0800 From: eruve erundun <eruveerundun@y.......> Subject: Re: Some musings on the "whammy" Interesting that you don't categor This certainly perked my interest. Interesting that you don't categorize Natalie's situation with Spark in the ep "A More Permanent Hell" as a situation 4. Was there a reason? My two cents certainly lean toward those conclusions that Angela arrived at, with the addition of the whammy likelihood is higher the more senior the vampire. (Natalie again, being whammied by Lacroix in "Be My Valentine"). Angela wrote: <snip> 4. The subject is a resister who quickly realizes what is being attempted, and plays along, convincing the vamp that the whammy worked. <end snip> ------------------------------ End of FORKNI-L Digest - 14 Dec 2010 to 15 Dec 2010 (#2010-35) **************************************************************
Previous |
This month's list |
Next |