There are 43 messages totalling 1018 lines in this issue. Topics in this special issue: 1. <No subject given> 2. Being brought over (3) 3. Dingoes 4. Casting-Star trek Voyager (2) 5. Nick's blood type? (2) 6. Why vampires burn up in the sun 7. WCT's ramble on the theory of vampires... 8. Being brought over -- Carouches explained! 9. Concealed Members 10. Jeez! Forgot to tell y'all... 11. New Game: Favourite Episodes That Never Were. (3) 12. New '96 FK Motor Co. Flying Vamps! 13. Forebodings: Ger's second audio book 14. New presidential candidate. 15. let's pester Oprah 16. Unwilling vampires (2) 17. Blind Faith (2) 18. Remember Canada? (3) 19. NATPE bags, money, and Dian(n)es 20. Interview with the Nightcrawler 21. Casting - other Star Trek productions 22. The Vaquero FAQ (2) 23. Vamps, Sun, Soulessness... (2) 24. Parent Advisory (3) 25. Fangs and Blood Sucking 26. Vamps, Sun, Soullessness... (2) 27. JMR's new word 28. The Geminis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:02:13 -0500 From: Tippi Blevins <TippiNB@a.......> Subject: <No subject given> isodes I wanna see that never were? A: Every fanfic I ever wrote! Yes, I have a cruel desire to make Vachon waltz with Lacroix. Yes, I wanted Nick to wear bunny slippers and talk to phone sex operators. And, yes, I especially wanted to see the FK characters get revenge on a TV conglomerate. ;) There's other stuff I wanna see, but I ain't postin it here. You've read the jadfe stories. You know what I mean. Thank goodness (or wickedness) for fanfic, right? I loved Twithted's "Trio" stories. I also liked Sukhmet's stories about what *really* happened that night Vesuvius decided it got tired of looking at Pompeii. There have been many other very good stories that fill in plot holes, right wrongs, and bring consistency to a sometimes erratic universe. Keep up the good work! Wicked Cousin Tippi ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:59:57 EST From: Dotti Rhodes <104024.3407@c.......> Subject: Re: Being brought over Stephanie wrote: "At this point, we've probably gone to more trouble to make sense of this than the show's writers have...." Ain't that the sad truth!! Dotti R Knightie 4-Ever ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 09:26:00 PST From: Christine Hawkins <chawkins@n.......> Subject: Dingoes GreyBrothr@a....... wrote: > Dingoes did not exist until after the English came to Australia...they are one > of the reasons there aren't any more Tasmanian wolves...same biological > niche. Wrong! Actually, dingoes were introduced into Australia before the first European settlement of Australia, and never made it to Tasmania. To quote the _Australian Encyclopedia_: "The weight of evidence indicates that it arrived in Australia as recently as 4000 years ago, but this figure might be a slight underestimate. Certainly there is no evidence for the widely held belief that it was introduced by Aborigines, who have occupied the continent for not less than 40,000 years. A more likely hypothesis is that it reached Australia in a domesticated state, accompanying Indonesian or South-East Asian fishermen who visited the northern coast of Australia. It entered Australia from the north and it is significant that it failed to enter Tasmania (which became separated from the mainland 14,000 years ago)." Anyway, I think it unlikely in the extreme that Screed ever ate a dingo! Christine Hawkins c.hawkins@n....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:45:52 -0800 From: John Soo-Hoo <galahad!jsoohoo@n.......> Subject: Re: Casting-Star trek Voyager <199603112003.MAA09083@m.......> #: >I cant think of any of the regulars who would make a goo Jeanette or >Lacroix-Can anybody else? >I would go with Seska for Janette. She's the former Maquis fighter and >lover of Chakotay who has now defected over to the Kazon camp. The dynamics >between those two are reminiscent of Nick and Janette. Chakotay's new life >as a Starfleet officer doesn't sit well with Seska, who has tried to >alternately destroy her former flame or lure him back into the mercenary life. <SPAT!> You can't be serious!? Seksa for Janette? The dynamics between them are vague at best. I don't believe Janette has ever tried to destory Nick. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 14:32:58 -0800 From: Swordsister <catheboo@c.......> Subject: Re: Nick's blood type? On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Stephanie Babbitt wrote: > But does anyone know Nick's blood type? Believe it or not, this may be Actually, in Stranger Than Fiction, the reason they knew that Emily Weiss' attacker wasn't a vampire was because he had a blood type, I don't remember what. Vampires apparently don't have one of any kind. Catherine --------------------------------------------------------------- Catherine Boone catheboo@c....... "Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon." - H. L. Mencken ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:13:07 -0330 From: Jason Ryan <ibe0018@i.......> Subject: Re: Why vampires burn up in the sun On Sat, 9 Mar 1996, Gary L Warren wrote: > Since when DON'T vampires have wings and/or become vampire bats? "Classical" Vampires do not become bats/mist/rats/shadows/etc. why would they?? I know I've seen it in the movies, but why would you want to become a horrible little rodent(forgive me bat lovers:) when you are so beautiful and so powerful. Besides, it's alot easier to stay the same shape and not use up energy trying to change. > in human form during flight. There are episodes where you do see Nick fly, and he is still in "human form" I forget the names, one was when a reporter was doing a show on something like "Cops" and she videotaped him flying down on some guy, later he had to whammy her because the enforcers wanted her dead. *************************************** "La vie pour toujours, ma chere petite" -Jason Ryan ibe0018@i....... *************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:36:06 -0500 From: Katja Stokley <cstokley@c.......> Subject: Re: Nick's blood type? On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Stephanie Babbitt wrote: > We know Nat gave him a pint of Schanke's blood once, > and among humans you only give same type to same type (or O to anybody) but > we also know that vampire bodies don't seem to give a whoop about > blood-type incompatibilities. It's not quite that simple (among humans) and I'm sure someone out there knows better than I, but if Schanke is A- then he can donate to A+/-, AB+/-, but not to B+/- or O+/-. Katja Stokley -*- cstokley@g....... -*- Enter any 12 digit prime number to continue -*- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:21:13 -0330 From: Jason Ryan <ibe0018@i.......> Subject: Re: WCT's ramble on the theory of vampires... On Sat, 9 Mar 1996, Sandra Gray wrote: > Tippi writes: > >a Virus doesn't make your teeth grow real fast then retract back into > >your head. But what if it does...It needs' a way to feed, the teeth being extremly sharp would do as a great weapon, and since their right next to the mouth there would be no loss of precious food(blood) The reason for retracting them would be for any animal, when you don't need them don't show them, don't scare you food away. *************************************** "La vie pour toujours, ma chere petite" -Jason Ryan ibe0018@i....... *************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:53:11 -0500 From: Tippi Blevins <TippiNB@a.......> Subject: Re: Being brought over -- Carouches explained! Stephanie Babbitt wrote: >So it seems that vampirism can be transmitted by biting alone, *if* the >victim has a reasonable amount of his/her own blood removed first. Hey maybe that's what Carouches are -- vampires made without receiving any vampire blood? It would make them a lower form of vampire, right? Because although I can believe that Perry would know to *bite* Jody, I don't think he'd know to slit open his paw and place it over her mouth... WCT ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:53:20 -0500 From: Tippi Blevins <TippiNB@a.......> Subject: Re: Concealed Members Apache wrote: > And how could I leave a possible comment about "concealed >members" untouched?... well, I will. <Tippi, your turn....> Wha...? Who's touching concealed members? "Get thee to a JADFEry quick!" Let's all keep our members, concealed and otherwise, to ourselves. This here's a family list. ;) Wicked Cousin Tippi ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 16:56:38 -0600 From: "Susanne M. Clark" <sclark@u.......> Subject: Re: Casting-Star trek Voyager ><SPAT!> You can't be serious!? Seksa for Janette? The dynamics between them >are vague at best. I don't believe Janette has ever tried to destory Nick. Well, yes the dynamics between them are not as well developed, as Seska is only a recurring character. My point was that she reminded me of Janette in that she is a pull on Chakotay to return to his old life, as Janette has been to Nick in the past. Maybe more character development between the two of them will occur, as Seska is supposed to be pregnant with Chakotay's child. As for Janette trying to destroy Nick, she hasn't *yet* but if we ever get more eps it will be interesting to see how she feels about him now... Susanne Clark sclark@u....... Forever Knightie ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:03:54 -0600 From: Annmarie McKee-Fitzgerald <mickey@c.......> Subject: Re: Jeez! Forgot to tell y'all... At 04:41 PM 3/11/96 -0500, you wrote: >So with a little luck, we'll get some more publicity out of this. Hope >y'all don't mind. OH JAMIE..You didn't!!!! *More publicity* !!! hehehe..YOU'RE WONDERFUL!!! Annmarie * ******************************************************** Save FOREVER KNIGHT! E-mail me or visit the homepage * http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html* ******************************************************** The Mother of Invention *had* to have been a single mother! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:20:19 -0500 From: Harper <RCMANN@d.......> Subject: New Game: Favourite Episodes That Never Were. Christine Hawkins asked: >I have an idea for a new game: given the chance to watch a never-made >episode of FK, what kind of episode would you would have most like to >have seen? My only rule is that the must not lead to the end of the >series - though it is quite welcome to take it off into new directions! I'd like to see the episode in which Tracy finds out that Nick is a vampire. I wonder how she'll react. She finds vampirism an exciting quality in Vachon -- dangerous and sexy -- but how will she regard it in her partner? How will she feel about trusting her life to a bloodsucking creature of the night? If she gets injured, and starts to bleed, will she get nervous (just a little?) as her partner bends solicitously over her? Inquiring minds want to know. Harper *** "Mostly Harmless" -- Douglas Adams Robin Carroll-Mann *** rcmann@d....... Save "Forever Knight"! For details see the web page at: http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:20:24 -0500 From: Harper <RCMANN@d.......> Subject: Re: New '96 FK Motor Co. Flying Vamps! >At 12:26 AM 3/10/96 EST,IdaliaK@p....... wrote: >>New for 1996, the FK Motor Company proudly presents the >>newly restyled Flying Vampire! You told us you wanted >>greater speed at take-off, softer landings, and easier [snip] >Does it come with fins? Never mind that. What about trunk space? >Annmarie Harper *** "Mostly Harmless" -- Douglas Adams Robin Carroll-Mann *** rcmann@d....... Save "Forever Knight"! For details see the web page at: http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 16:34:12 EST From: MARG YAMANAKA <ZEZQ01A@p.......> Subject: Forebodings: Ger's second audio book I just got a note from Tangled Web saying that Ger's new audio book, "Forebodings" will be shipping the third week in March. If anyone wants more info on this or Ger's fist tape "Hauntings", please e-mail me Marg ZEZQ01A@p....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:32:27 -0500 From: Lillian Feden <feden@m.......> Subject: Re: New presidential candidate. Alora wrote: >> Cal wrote: Well, at least we'd have a First Couple where there was no doubt >> which of the pair was the brains of the administration..... >> > "AHEM!!!" sound of all Knighties collectively clearing their throats. > ><sound of Natpackers applauding!> Well, at least we know that neither one will bother telling the other what's on their mind. That couple has the worst communication problem I've ever seen. I think that in that respect, they <both> deserve the B-word (that's brick, I mean brick!!!) Lillian feden@m....... |Forever Knightie/Immortal Beloved| http://www.mcs.com/~feden Order Forever Knightie sweatshirts - deadline March 15 E-mail me for details "Imagination was given to man to compensate for what he is not; a sense of humor to console him for what he is." Francis Bacon ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:00:50 -0500 From: Tippi Blevins <TippiNB@a.......> Subject: let's pester Oprah Okay, well, let's not *pester* her, but let's consider writing a letter or two, shall we? Was watching the show with my grandmother the other day and they had these two college girls/women on, talking about how they had had a hand in saving the TV show Party of Five. You know what these two did to get on the Oprah show? One of them wrote a letter to Oprah and the other one got 24 friends to sign a petetion. THAT'S ALL! C'mon, we've done WAY more. What about the blood drive? The PAF charity? The Natpe convention?? If you're on AOL, go to Keyword OPRAH. I'm trying to find out the email address for non-aol people. I know Ms. Winfrey seems to have an aversion to vampires, but I think if enough of us write... Well hell it couldn't hurt, right? Wicked Cousin Tippi ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:20:42 -0500 From: Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......> Subject: Re: Unwilling vampires I've been thinking again. :) In Bad Blood, the episode with Jack the Ripper, Jack attacks and seems to kill the black rookie cop, Brianna. But at the end of the ep, we see the vampire hunter O'Neill shoot a vampire Brianna with a crossbow bolt, destroying her. Well, how do we fit Brianna into the "choose" theory? She tells O'Neill when he gifts her with a cross that she comes from a religious family. So if she had a "near death" experience like Nick, why didn't she choose to die rather than be made a vampire? Are only *some* people given a choice of whether to die or be brought across? Since Jack didn't ask her permission or tell her anything about it, what happened? If she *was* religious, shouldn't she have had the choice to die or not to die? Or was she offered a "way to die" (at O'Neill's hands) later perhaps? And if so, why? --Sandra Gray, forever Knightie --tmp_harkins@d....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:08:46 -0500 From: Robbi Egersdorf <egersdor@m.......> Subject: Re: Being brought over >These instances of people and animals being brought across >seemingly without deliberate intent on the part of the parent vampire >is the most annoying kink in my scientific theory of vampirism. My son, who is a self proclaimed vampire expert told me in a discussion we had the other day that "mainstream" vampires can bring someone across inadvertantly, possibly by exchange of saliva or whatever during the feeding process. Because of this a good vampire breaks the victims neck in order to avoid bring that person across accidently. I have also witnessed several times in FK where the victims neck was broken (ie GVP) and in fanfic. >Particularly, if vampirism is genetic, then human vampire DNA >should be completely incompatible with animals' DNA. However, if Remeber the DNA that originally turned the dog into a vampire was from a humaniod, in both cases. Robbi Knightie (with dark tendencies) loving the angst! egersdor@m....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 14:37:19 -0800 From: John Soo-Hoo <galahad!jsoohoo@n.......> Subject: Re: Blind Faith <199603111926.LAA23523@m.......> >I've been following the whole "Blind Faith" thread with a great deal of >interest, and a thought occurred to me: >Re: Raleigh >Nick and Raleigh got together in the late 1800's, right? The purebred dog >was generally owned solely by the wealthy, who would certainly notice if one >of their pets, especially one imported from Germany, went AWOL. Not really, if you consider the possibility that the dog may have been the runt of the litter. It was not uncommon practice for runts to be cast out, destroyed, or given away. >So how in the Sam Hill did Nick stumble across Raleigh...a "stray" purebred >Rottweiler? Wouldn't it have been more historically accurate for him to have >been a mongrel? I don't believe this is a problem with historical accuracy, but probability. Dogs can runaway or be lost regardless of breed. John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:02:31 -0800 From: John Soo-Hoo <galahad!jsoohoo@n.......> Subject: Re: Remember Canada? <199603112129.NAA08372@m.......> >> However, why do I have the feeling that against all obvious logic, LaCroix >> would somehow prove to be very popular with the religious right? I can't agree with you here. LaCroix has always exhibited an anti-religious views. He actually mocks religion that mortals practice and sees those that practice it fools. >Absolutism is absolutism, in whatever form... <g> Talking "family >values," LaCroix style... They'd admire his "firm discipline"... >sympathize with how hard he's tried to keep his family together... >condemn his horribly unfilial son... revel in his consistency... praise his >military experience... LaCroix is very cold and orderly. If you want to compare it with the religious right, you would cover the legalism, but leave out the compassionant aspect. >Actually, the thought of LC as president is less frightening than >the thought of a certain person now running on that base... At least >LC could be trusted to preserve the human race... if not any specific >members thereof. <g> Preserve the human race? Probably, but I would doubt his motives for doing it. I suspect it would involve locked rooms filled with mortals whose sole purpose is to provide sustenance. A world of where the strong would be the only that deserve to survive. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:37:34 -0600 From: Diane Echelbarger <gryphon@e.......> Subject: NATPE bags, money, and Dian(n)es Hello, people. First, let me explain, for those of you who are confused by this, that Dianne DeSha and I are two separate people. She is a tall, redheaded Merc who lives in California. I am an average height, unaffilliated brunette, who lives in Wisconsin. We both went to NATPE, but we are *two* different people. :) Mailing things to her will not get them to me. Likewise, mailing them to me will not get them to her. And mailing checks to *either* of us will not get them into the NATPE bag & ad fund! Especially if they're made out to me, since I am not and have never been in charge of handling money, and the people who are live 1/3 of the way across the US from me. Really. To donate to the NATPE fund, *please* mail your checks, made out to Laurie Cohen Fenster, NOT TO MYSELF OR DIANNE, to: SOS-FK NATPE Fund [Address removed] And I have a very small number of NATPE bag/brochure/article combos left (24). If you want one or more of these, e-mail me (DO NOT reply to the list!) and I will tell you how to go about getting one. This will also guarantee that I save one for you. The remainder of the bags I brought back from Las Vegas went up to Toronto last weekend, to be distributed at several Canadian cons, in conjunction with Save FK efforts. And Kayla O'Neal, please e-mail me about the envelope I received today? You didn't put your e-mail address in the envelope, so I can't contact you privately. And everybody, don't forget to FOLD CRANES FOR FOREVER KNIGHT! Mail them by Saturday! We have almost enough cranes for 1/2 of one mobile, and we want MORE! MORE! *MORE!* <vbg> I know you can do it! :) Diane E NATPE Strike Force Commander, Retired Coordinator, FK Wishing Crane Project Unaffiliated # D Echelbarger gryphon@e....... # # WWW HomePage: http://www.execpc.com/~echelbar/ # ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:45:11 -0700 From: Marg Rothschild <marg.r@a.......> Subject: Re: Interview with the Nightcrawler Thanks to all who sent me a copy. Much appreciated :) Marg Rothschild, knightie/cousin/FFFROGie ** Help Save/Revive Forever Knight** write me at: margr@i....... more info: http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:10:02 -0500 From: Andy & Roni Power <bach19@i.......> Subject: Re: New Game: Favourite Episodes That Never Were. Hi guys, At 03:56 PM 3/11/96 PST, Christine Hawkins wrote: >I have an idea for a new game: given the chance to watch a never-made >episode of FK, what kind of episode would you would have most like to have This is what I would like to see. I know it will never happen in a billion years unless someone writes it in fanfic. <HINT HINT> :-) Nick and Schanke follow a murder suspect to Chicago and team up with (you all know where this is heading don't you?) Ray and Frasier. Not only does Schake have to deal with an eccentric partner, now he has to deal with a straight-as-a-arrow mountie with a deaf wolf. Needless to say, Ray and Schanke hit it off big time and visit all the souvlaki stands in Chicago while Fraiser wonders why Deif won't go near Nick. Franny starts chasing after Nick and we get to see Nick try to smuggle bottles of blood across the border in his suitcase. Oh and they do catch the murderer. Roni. ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ ~~~~Schanke-He's a *Good* cop with *Good* instints.~~~ ~~~~Become a FoD! The 0+ FoD~*~bach19@i.......~~~ ~It must be winter. The Knights are getting shorter.~ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 16:30:54 -0800 From: John Soo-Hoo <galahad!jsoohoo@n.......> Subject: Re: Casting - other Star Trek productions <199603082249.OAA16003@m.......> >> Classic Trek cast ('60s version): >>Nick-Kirk >Natalie-Nurse Chapel >Janette-Uhura >Schanke-Scotty >>Tracy-Chekov >Reese-McCoy > LaCroix - ? >Umm... how 'bout the obvious? Spock plays LC. Okay, how about Mudd for Schanke? John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:57:52 PST From: Flint Howard <hzf30@m.......> Subject: Re: The Vaquero FAQ Hi Dona, I don't actually know what the "Vaquero FAQ" is but I wouldn't mind checking it out so if you could send me a copy I'd appreciate it. Thanks, -Flint ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 20:02:45 -0600 From: Raven <ab950@s.......> Subject: Vamps, Sun, Soulessness... Now, Diana took my little statement about the inherit 'soulessness' or 'evilness' of vampires as a reason not to watch Forever Knight. =) I'd put it the exact oppisite way... Perhaps they possess an inherit evil, but the whole challenge is to overcome it, for Nick at least. Even for the other vamps to, because if even Lacroix ever /truly/ gave into his evil nature completly and absolutly, he'd be unable to stop himself, killing person after person and loosing all resembalnce to a thinking being. So, what Nick must do is come to terms with the evil that is part of existance, and realize that it's not so much 'his' evil as the evil of *What* he is. =) Dunno, maybe my time playing Vampire: The Masqurade has tainted my thinking. Maybe? HAH. For sure. ;) Not nessisarly a bad thing though... ___________________ ____________ \_ _ \_ _ \_ | \_ ____/::::::. Raven -- Wade Lahoda | | | | | | | __/:::: ::::: MageCraft BBS (000) 000-0000 | | | | | | | | |:: ::::: ab950@s....... |___| |___|___|\_____/|_______|:: :::::hP! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:01:01 -0500 From: Chana Rossman <bonney@i.......> Subject: Re: New Game: Favourite Episodes That Never Were. This may have already been done in FANFIC, and it's not an entire plot for an episode, but I've always thought it would be fun to have Natalie and Dana Scully (X-Files) meet an a corner's convention... bonney@i....... If life were easy, then just anybody could do it. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:07:56 -0500 From: Debra Szumlinski <debras@m.......> Subject: Re: Remember Canada? At 04:03 AM 3/11/96 -0500, Ann wrote: >Natalie, Lacroix, and Janette for President? > >I know it's a terribly small consideration next to the fact that all >the nominated are *fictional,* but...has it occurred to anyone >that all the afore mentioned happen to be Canadian? Nope. Only Natalie is Canadian by birth. LaCroix is Roman and Janette is French. Besides, since they make up entire new identities every time they move they can be any nationality they want. Has anyone considered a LaCroix/Nat ticket. LaCroix has the Cousinly vote and they'd probably run a heck of a campaign (I will not discuss ballot box stuffing or voter intimidation at this juncture.). He has not only military experience but was a general thats ususally good for votes. With him in office stalemates between the executive branch and congress are likely to end rather "abruptly" in his favor. He can give very "convincing" campaign speeches. Natalie would probably get a good percentage of women voters and then there's the mortal vote. She's got experience in the health care field. She's willing to take on apparently impossible tasks which would help when it came to balancing the budget. She's also tough enough to keep at it with the likes of LaCroix threatening so we know she's got guts. Now what would the rest of the cast do? There are lots of cabinet posts out there. Felix would definitely have to be considered for Secretary of the Treasury. Deb ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:14:24 -0800 From: Jackie <ejdjd@i.......> Subject: Re: Parent Advisory At 04:21 PM 3/11/96 -0800, Lisa Reeves wrote: >My son is well and truly addicted. <gryn> He's 9, and thinks Nick is "cool". >Personally, compared to some of the drek they show for kids, this is positive >to me. Hey, my 15 year old is a true Cousin...do you have *any* conception of what it is like to live with a good-looking, teen-aged, hormone driven, mouthy, junior *cousin*? Do you? Do you? Nah, I doubt it......AND he wants to go to Canada with me to see "what that dude, Nick, looks like in tights"!!!! AND, he is totally convinced that I will be taking him because, hey, I'm his Mom! Boy, will he learn a lesson! Jackie Support your local Attorney...Send your kid to Medical School! ejdjd@i....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 20:04:52 -0500 From: Robbi Egersdorf <egersdor@m.......> Subject: Re: Fangs and Blood Sucking What if the vampire's fangs were hallow with the opening being at the top of the fang leading into the front of the mouth. In that case they would act as a funnel in funneling the blood into the mouth. If the x-ray in NiQ didn't show any aberant sinuses, did it show his fangs tucked up in his upper jaw? (Just curious.) I couldn't see the details very clear. Robbi Knightie (with dark tendencies) and loving the angst egersdor@m....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:14:01 -0800 From: Lisa Reeves <ad483@d.......> Subject: Re: Parent Advisory Jackie wrote: > Hey, my 15 year old is a true Cousin...do you have *any* conception > of what it is like to live with a good-looking, teen-aged, hormone driven, > mouthy, junior *cousin*? Do you? Do you? Nah, I doubt it......AND he > wants to go to Canada with me to see "what that dude, Nick, looks like in > tights"!!!! AND, he is totally convinced that I will be taking him because, > hey, I'm his Mom! OOooo. There's a thought...a Cousin with....<shudder>.... PMS. -- Lisa Reeves @-->--->--- | ad483@d....... GDFN Help Staff | Mercenary for Chocolate Save Forever Knight! Site for details: http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:41:08 -0800 From: Frisson <frisson@i.......> Subject: Re: Vamps, Sun, Soulessness... >Now, Diana took my little statement about the inherit 'soulessness' or >'evilness' of vampires as a reason not to watch Forever Knight. No, not at all! I said *if* I believed that Vampires are evil, then FK would not interest me. Evil, souless creatures with no hope for redemption are the stuff of bad horror movies and do not interest me. I *do not* feel this way and never could feel this way about Forever Knight. I *do* believe that FK Vampires have souls and I do not believe that they are evil. I do believe that they can find redemption as Vampires! I'm more inclined to believe that humans are evil. (Vampires kill humans for food *as a general rule.* Humans kill each other for just about every other reason.) >Perhaps they possess an inherit evil, >but the whole challenge is to overcome it, for Nick at least. This is exactly my point, except that I believe if Nick can overcome the evil that dwells within him, then he does have a soul, can be redeemed and is not inherently evil. If he were evil, or damned, then he would not ever be able to overcome or accept 'the beast.' >and realize that it's not so much 'his' evil as the evil of >*What* he is. =) If by 'what he is', you mean a Vampire, then I strongly disagree with this. Nicholas de Brabant, the human, was a murderer. A Crusader, yes, but a murderer. Becoming a Vampire only gave him a better reason to kill, IMO. Thanks again for the discussion. ;-) Cousin Diana mercenary Frisson@i....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:48:48 -0500 From: Katja Stokley <cstokley@c.......> Subject: Re: Vamps, Sun, Soullessness... On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Frisson wrote: > Nicholas de Brabant, the human, was a murderer. A Crusader, yes, but a > murderer. Becoming a Vampire only gave him a better reason to kill, IMO. What do you base this statement on? Are all soldiers murderers? Or was there some murder Nick committed as a mortal that I missed? I agree that Nick doesn't seem to have been too noble as a mortal. :-) Katja Stokley -*- cstokley@g....... -*- Enter any 12 digit prime number to continue -*- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:58:58 -0500 From: Apache <lf@c.......> Subject: Re: JMR's new word On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Jamie Melody Randell wrote: > >wouldn't it be either anthrosanguivorous or homosanguivorous, depending > > True. These would be acceptable words. > > But quite frankly, that second one just doesn't have the connotation I'm > going for... <blink> <blink> no? not even with Lacroix delicately sampling blood off Nick's chin? works for me... <g> L. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:03:36 -0900 From: Muldy Sculler <ffbmh@a.......> Subject: Re: Unwilling vampires The African-Canadian rookie officer's name was Bridget, no? Barbara ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 22:08:02 -0500 From: "(Beth Brown)" <BKBVA@a.......> Subject: Re: Parent Advisory In a message dated 96-03-11 16:47:04 EST, you write: >My son is well and truly addicted. <gryn> He's 9, and thinks Nick is "cool". >Personally, compared to some of the drek they show for kids, this is positive >to me. > > De-lurking to the list to add my two cents. I don't let my 9 year old daughter watch - first of all, its on too late. While there's certainly no more sex or violence than anything else on TV (maybe even less), I don't want to have to try to explain the premise and the vampire lore to her. I'm not sure I could get it right, as I haven't been watching long enough. Maybe if she was a year or two older. However, I read an article about the "Goosebumps" books for kids this morning, and compared to them, maybe I *should* let her watch. And yes, I was also around 12 when I started watching Dark Shadows. Beth ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 20:49:22 -0800 From: Bonnela Pardoe <bonnie@o.......> Subject: Re: Being brought over Sandra wrote: >I know dog and human DNA aren't the same, but is it possible that there >is some similar cell function in each that the virus would attack that >causes both to exhibit vampire traits? Very similar biologically -- humans and dogs are both mammals -- which is why some medical research is done on dogs (as well as on other mammals). > I know in the real world there >have been viruses that have crossed over from animals to humans (isn't >HIV one?). Don't know about HIV, but *I* gave my dog tonsillitis (yes, dogs do have tonsils) last time I was sick. Well... we've very close. Dona Bonnela, Vaquera (bonnie@o.......) "Do you trust me?" -- JDV ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 20:54:43 -0800 From: Bonnela Pardoe <bonnie@o.......> Subject: Re: Blind Faith Stephanie wrote: >Has anyone read "The Hound of the Baskervilles"? I haven't. How does Doyle >describe the hound(s?) in question? The dog may have had to be a Rottie to >match the book. I read it a looong time ago, but as I recall it was actually a hound -- like a wolf hound. No one ever saw it except at night and it had been painted with phosphorescent paint so that it's body glowed (not it's eyes). But.... Dona Bonnela, Vaquera (bonnie@o.......) "Do you trust me?" -- JDV ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 22:33:38 -0500 From: Max ERnst <pearl@g.......> Subject: Re: The Geminis I'm in Cousinly Heaven after reading Uncle's speech... Max ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just like the Talamasca, I'm always watching! Pearl@g....... ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 22:43:55 -0500 From: Max ERnst <pearl@g.......> Subject: Re: The Vaquero FAQ > if you have asked for a >Vaquero FAQ and not received it yet could you please re-contact me I haven't received my Vaquero FAQ yet. If you could send it to me I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Max ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just like the Talamasca, I'm always watching! Pearl@g....... ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 23:41:47 -0500 From: Harper <RCMANN@d.......> Subject: Re: Remember Canada? Jamie the Webgoddess proclaimed: >fangs and how people might taste to sanguiniverous sorts; and we're >gonna be balked by a little thing like citizenship? >Also: LaCroix and Janette are not Canadian. LaCroix and Janette predate >Canada. The relevant thing is that none of them are native-born American citizens. Nick might be eligible to run for president, since his current bio says that he was born in Chicago, though I'm not sure how his Canadian residency (citizenship?) alters things. More importantly, I doubt that even Larry Merlin's computer tricks could stand up to the kind of spotlight that's cast on a presidential candidate. The media has this "insatiable curiosity;" they'd want to interview Nick's kindergarten teacher, his first girlfriend, and, of course, his family. Can you see Dan Rather interviewing LaCroix? <g> Harper *** "Mostly Harmless" -- Douglas Adams Robin Carroll-Mann *** rcmann@d....... Save "Forever Knight"! For details see the web page at: http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:28:47 -0500 From: Kimberly Bjarkman <flowper@o.......> Subject: Re: Vamps, Sun, Soullessness... Katja Stokley writes (re: the mortal de Brabant soldier=murderer? discussion): > I agree that Nick doesn't seem to have been too noble as a mortal. :-) Here's one for the Mercs: read Terry Jones' (of Monty Python) brilliant study of Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" called "Chaucer's Knight: Portrait of a Medieval Mercenary," in which he proves the glorious knight along on the pilgrimmage -- who has long been thought by scholars to be the one pilgrim unstained by sin, included to make all of the other pilgrims pale by comparison -- must have been a mercenary, murderer, etc., and possibly the most serious sinner of the lot. Jones provides an astounding amount of historical fact to document this theory. ------------------------------ End of FORKNI-L Digest - 11 Mar 1996 to 12 Mar 1996 - Special issue *******************************************************************
Previous |
This month's list |
Next |