Home Page How I Found Forever Knight Forkni-L Archives Main Page Forkni-L Earlier Years
My Forever Knight Fanfiction Links E-Mail Me

FORKNI-L

Digest - 19 Feb 1996 to 20 Feb 1996 - Special issue

Tue, 20 Feb 1996

There are 44 messages totalling 1011 lines in this issue.

Topics in this special issue:

  1. FK Vamps reading from blood?
  2. FW: Nick's hair
  3. Sick of Top Tens yet? (7)
  4. Choosing Factions (2)
  5. rights?
  6. <sigh> (2)
  7. Valentines (2)
  8. Cranes
  9. Nat as a Vamp (2)
 10. The Top Ten returns!
 11. Nick's last name
 12. Re(2): SOS-FK Commercial <again> (2)
 13. Nick the Cop
 14. Your opinion on a Letter
 15. Top Ten Lists Forever! (3)
 16. Top Ten Reasons to Join the Fic-Wars (4)
 17. Fanfic list (2)
 18. List Biz - A Request
 19. How Many Will Stay On? (6)
 20. You might be a KOQTV if... (2)
 21. FK Posthumous List

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:47:46 -0500
From:    Marcia Tucker <ScFiMarci@a.......>
Subject: FK Vamps reading from blood?

Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......> wrote on 2/18:

>>I don't think there's any clearcut indication that vamps in the FK
universe can learn a lot about a mortal's thoughts, feelings, etc.
by drinking his/her blood.  As for where bottled blood comes from,
well, I guess we can imagine that however we want. ;)<<

I'd agree on this about learning from blood.  Also, I really can't recall
anywhere where an FK vampire was actually learning anything from a *mortal's*
blood, only from another vampire's blood.  We saw evidence of the latter in
"Last Act" in particular, where Nick read in Erica's blood her wish to
suicide when she felt she would be a burden on others one day.  (Nice scene,
by the way!  And if you ever get a hold of a Canadian version, this is one of
those scenes that is much longer!)

Anyone else recall similar instances?  Anyone recall examples where something
was learned from mortal blood?

Marcia Tucker
ScFiMarci@a.......
Dark Knightie / Immortal Beloved

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:39:24 PST
From:    Sherri Lynn Godsey <us011164@p.......>
Subject: FW: Nick's hair

>At 04:54 PM 2/19/96 -0500, Lisa Knust, Knightie, wrote:
>        And just a question- What is up with Ger in the past few eps.  Is
>it his hair or something that makes him look tired & grumpy?  Something
>just seems different.

I've thought the same thing, particularly in this last ep.  But don't you
think that's a result of the situation as much as anything?  The poor people
are working terrible hours under great pressure, and know the show will
shortly end for them.  Ger, who generally takes it on himself to keep spirits
up for the cast and crew, is probably exhausted.  I think he looks tired
because he *is* tired, and probably depressed as well.  How much pressure can
anyone in that situation take?

And maybe his longer hair is in preparation for the play coming up.  I liked
it better at the beginning of the season, but then we were all a bit happier
then, weren't we?


**Sherri Lynn Godsey, Founding Member SFKS. us011164@p....... --
"Think where man's glory most begins and ends, and say my glory was I had
such friends" in Forever Knight. SAVE FK! Write for info re SOS webpage**

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 19:45:58 -0800
From:    Roni Power <bach@c.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

Hi All,

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Tippi Blevins wrote:

> The Top Ten Things FK Characters Do Behind Closed Doors:
> 1.  Two words: Lacroix polkas!

ROTFL!!!!  Must have been all the Souvalki LC ate while possed by Schanke
during WAR 5.  <g>>

Schanke-He's a *Good* Cop! With  |Pinky are you pondering what I'm pondering?
*Good* Instincts! Become A FoD!  |  I think so Brain but if we didn't have
Roni Power  bach@c.......  O+ FoD|      ears, we'd look like weasels.

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:08:38 -0500
From:    Cousin Candice <winter@j.......>
Subject: Re: Choosing Factions

On Sat, 17 Feb 1996, Tippi Blevins wrote:


Well, I found the original post, yes I know I'm very far behind in my
e-mail to the list (blame the University -our system went *Sulk*whine*I-
Need-Attention* Crash*)
        ..needless to say, I've been made aware by some
people (no, they weren't Knighties OR Cousins) that a series of
misunderstandings were passed around earlier about this week as to what a
Cousin actually was...

List of reasons to be a Cousin. :)

> 10. You get to hang out in the Raven with scantily clad Ravens and
> Ravenettes.

Firstly, Ravens and Ravenettes no longer inhabit the Raven.  They fled at
the start of this season -they didn't want to be "corrupted" by the new
kind of order Uncle brought along after Janette left.  Secondly,
Raven/ettes would NEVER be cought DEAD clad scantily.... well at least
not in public.  That's my job..*blush*fume*has thoughts of revenge for
the next War*

>  9.  You get to share eyebrow pencils with Uncle himself.

Definitely a misconception.  *Looks around confused*  Anyone else care to
explain this one?

>  8.  You get to paint the town *red* with all the rest of us Cousins. ;)
>  6.  You get to be a *good* vampire instead of a *bad* human!

These two I'm lumping together just on general principle.  I'd like to
make one thing _absolutely clear_.  Of the currently active Cousins on this
list -NONE of them are VAMPIRES.  None, and this was a "rule" of sorts
established before War 4 (?) I think it was -just to protect the other
players from becoming lunch for (new) Cousins.

Laurie?  Lisa?  Back me on this one?

>  5.  You get to corrupt Newbies with your wickedness.

Well, this one's true...*Wicked Smile*

>  4.  You get to keep Nick on a leash!

You're joking, right?  More like being kept on LaCroix's leash (only at
the BEST of times...Thanks You Diane E. *grin*)

> And the Number One Reason for becoming a Cousin:
>  1.  Lacroix!

I suppose that counts for something...

Yours,
Candice -obsessed by memory, befriended by desire, Cousin by choice
          Toreador by default
winter@j.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:57:16 -0800
From:    Lisa Reeves <ad483@d.......>
Subject: Re: rights?

Ngaire Genge wrote:

> The Miranda case was a US decision and has no bearing on Canadian law,
> however, Canadian citizens, under their own laws must also be informed of
> any constitutional rights pertinent to their situation, in fact, just
> questioning a Canadian citizen usually requires the spiel.

Would it be -exactly- the same spiel, tho?

--
Lisa Reeves @-->--->---  |  ad483@d.......
  GDFN Help Staff        |  Mercenary for Chocolate
     Save Forever Knight! Site for details:
http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:11:35 -0800
From:    Lisa Reeves <ad483@d.......>
Subject: <sigh>

I wandered into the Electric Library tonite.

Being the FK junkie that I am, I did a search. What I found was a bit
depressing.

September 25, 1994, LA Times. Executive producer Jon Slan is quoted in an
article explaining why they chose to take FK into syndication, rather than
shopping for another network for CBS. He rather specifically states that
their whole goal was to take the series to 65 episodes, so that it would be
strippable.

Rather left me with the feeling that we're fighting a decision that was
decided under the table a long time ago...

--
Lisa Reeves @-->--->---  |  ad483@d.......
  GDFN Help Staff        |  Mercenary for Chocolate
     Save Forever Knight! Site for details:
http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:17:23 -0500
From:    Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......>
Subject: Re: Valentines

Alora writes:
>I think that Nat and LC could go head-to-head in a way that Nick and
>LC never could...of course it would first be necessary to level the
>playing field. And the only way to do that would be to make Nat a vampire.

But LC is almost 2000 years old to Nat's would be fledgling.  I don't
think simply her being made a vamp would "level the playing field".
And you really didn't answer a lot of my questions either about how
such an event might change Nat.  Nat may work in a morgue, but she has
always struck me as someone who has a leaning to moral "goodness".  LC
is not inclined to that sort of morality.  Their outlooks are quite
different.  Further, imo Nat is drawn to Nick in part because he tries
to resist his more "evil" tendencies and try to do some good instead.
Do you think Nat would help Nick if he wanted to be mortal but was
still going around killing people?  I don't think Nat would really want
to be a vampire.

--Sandra Gray, forever Knightie
--tmp_harkins@d.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 20:32:42 -0800
From:    Wendy Marie Christensen <wendy@i.......>
Subject: Cranes

Could I have the address for the Crane websites...I seem to have forgoton
how to do them....I am missing a step somewhere....and my cranes are
looking mighty stupid...Thanks.

Love,                         \|/
Wendy Marie                  |o o|
                   -------ooO~(_)~Ooo------
                  wendy@i.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:29:39 -0500
From:    Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......>
Subject: Re: Nat as a Vamp

Bonnie writes:
>Nick always expects his "kids" to have the same morality as he does,
>but he forgets that it took him how many hundreds of years to want to
>change?...Take Richard, for example, he wasn't really an evil vampire --

Well, first, I don't think I said *Nick* had to be the one to bring
Nat over.  And I think he can remember the pull of the bloodlust; the
problem he's had with people he's brought over has been more due to not
wanting to *control* their actions as he has felt LC controlled him.

While Richard wasn't really an "evil" vampire, I think he was heading
in that direction (or at least to being an "amoral" vampire).  One of
the people he killed was the woman who was going to testify against the
bad guys and he felt drawn to attacking his wife (who certainly wasn't
a criminal).

--Sandra Gray, forever Knightie
--tmp_harkins@d.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:41:48 -0500
From:    Carrie Krumtum <Carrie400@a.......>
Subject: Re: The Top Ten returns!

HELP! HELP! I CAN'T BREATH!!! <<<ROTFL>>>

Carrie
Proud Knightie

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:42:01 -0500
From:    colin paddock <Claudius@n.......>
Subject: Re: Valentines

At 11:17 PM 02/19/1996 -0500, you
>But LC is almost 2000 years old to Nat's would be fledgling.  I don't
>think simply her being made a vamp would "level the playing field".


Sure LC might be 2000 years old, but nat is pretty darn stubborn...I think
LC would be in for a pretty tough fight...
CP

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:45:07 -0500
From:    Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......>
Subject: Re: Nick's last name

Ray writes:
>wasn't Nick's character in the blacklist ep called Professor Nicholas?

If you're speaking about first season's Spin Doctor (where Nick was
suspected of being a Communist in the 1954 flashback), his last name
in that was Girard, I believe (I may have spelled that wrong).  He
kept his desk nameplate as a memento and Nat picks it up to look at it
in the end of the ep.

--Sandra Gray, forever Knightie
--tmp_harkins@d.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:51:00 -0500
From:    Cynthia R Ratajczak <crr2@a.......>
Subject: Re: Re(2): SOS-FK Commercial <again>

Katya, I have the address of the Buffalo station that shows Forever Knight
at 12:05am (Sat. latenight/ early Sunday).  It's WKBW-TV, and you Paul
Cassidy, Pesident/General Manager WKBW

Cynthia Ratajczak
crr2@a.......

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Hilary Doda wrote:

> Alora asked about stations who show FK...
> there's CFTO Tv here...but does anyone have the number to phone for this sort
> of thing? My call got bounced among three different secretaries...
>
> And there's ABC ( I think...it's the one with "Eyewitness News")...channel 14
> on Toronto Roger's cable...anyways, it runs FK at 12:05 AM sundays, so
> commercial time is likely to be inexpensive, although it won't get all that
> many people...but it's infinitely better than 3:00 AM. Anyways, does someone
> out there actually know which channel I'm talking about? Is there someone in
> the Buffalo area to phone there?
>
> Katya
> -=feel the call of the Knight...=-
>  * Raven * X-Phile * Trekker * FFFROGie * Crusader *
>
>
> --
>
>
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>                       TEdNet - Teacher Education Network
>             TEL Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Toronto
>
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:02:21 -0500
From:    Cynthia R Ratajczak <crr2@a.......>
Subject: Re: Re(2): SOS-FK Commercial <again>

Katya,
Sorry about that message that I sent by mistake!  The station that shows
Forever Knight in the Buffalo area is WKBW-TV.  You can write to :

Paul Cassidy, President/General Manager
WKBW/ Queen City Broadcasting, Inc.
[Address removed]


Forever Knight is shown on WKBW-TV (Channel 7) at 12:05am latenight
Saturday/ early Sunday.

Cynthia Ratajczak
crr2@a.......

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Hilary Doda wrote:

> Alora asked about stations who show FK...
> there's CFTO Tv here...but does anyone have the number to phone for this sort
> of thing? My call got bounced among three different secretaries...
>
> And there's ABC ( I think...it's the one with "Eyewitness News")...channel 14
> on Toronto Roger's cable...anyways, it runs FK at 12:05 AM sundays, so
> commercial time is likely to be inexpensive, although it won't get all that
> many people...but it's infinitely better than 3:00 AM. Anyways, does someone
> out there actually know which channel I'm talking about? Is there someone in
> the Buffalo area to phone there?
>
> Katya
> -=feel the call of the Knight...=-
>  * Raven * X-Phile * Trekker * FFFROGie * Crusader *
>
>
> --
>
>
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>                       TEdNet - Teacher Education Network
>             TEL Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Toronto
>
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:03:59 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Re: Nick the Cop

>I can't spell it worth a darn, but it's something like poryphria or
>porphyria.  The people who have it get all blistered up in the sun after just
>a couple minutes exposure.

FOund it in the Merck Manual.  Protoporphyria:  "A dominantly transmitted
disorder characterized by acute photosensitivity reactions, no urine
abnormalities (common in other forms), and, in some patients, serious liver
disease."

Wasn't the name mentioned in "Black Buddah"?  It doesn't sound like
something a cop would have (and be allowed into active duty) without some
SERIOUS hypnosis work.  A simple physical allergy to sunlight sounds more
logical.

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:12:57 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Re: Your opinion on a Letter

>I have written a letter to Ms. Onoyoma of Sony USA.  Would you please do me
>the honor of proofreading it?  The letter will be sent with a "King Cake" -
>a Southern confection specially made for the holiday preceding Easter (Mardi
>Gras).

Pretty good, except that "Hajimemashite" is used only when meeting a person
for the first time face-to-face.

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 20:20:09 -0900
From:    Muldy Sculler <ffbmh@a.......>
Subject: Re: Choosing Factions

Reasons? I thought much of the mystique of being a cousin is that cousins
"don't have to have no stinking reasons."  When people ask they curl a
lip and walk on.
Barbara

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:39:48 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

>1.  Two words: Lacroix polkas!

Oh, god, I'm in pain!

Question:  Is it polka, or one of Weird Al's "Alternative Polkas"?

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:45:08 -0500
From:    colin paddock <Claudius@n.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

At 11:39 PM 02/19/1996 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>>1.  Two words: Lacroix polkas!
>
>Oh, god, I'm in pain!

What's wrong with polka?!?!?
CP

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:51:45 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Top Ten Lists Forever!

Okay, you didn't ask for it, you probably don't want it, but you're getting
it.  Another top ten list...


              WHY YOU WOULD RATHER BE A COUSIN (AND YOU KNOW YOU ARE)

10.  Nightcrawler backup when Uncle's busy.

9.  Cool sword pin.

8.  Uncle (heavy breathing)

7.  Knighties need Prozac; Vaqueros need a haircut; NatPackers need... okay,
can't think of anything right now...

6.  No cover charge to Raven.

5.  Morals?  We don't need no stinking morals...

4.  Access to Uncle's collection of Vintage "wine".

3.  See #8.

2.  Wear all the black you want.

And the number one reason to be a Cousin...

1.  Because if you don't, Uncle will get you.  Now, you don't want that to
happen, do you?...

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:54:31 EST
From:    MS CHRISTINA L KAMNIKAR <VQRW76A@p.......>
Subject: Top Ten Reasons to Join the Fic-Wars

It just occurred to me... while we've been talking up the reasons to join
one faction or another, but no one has told the new guys the best reasons
to be in the Wars!

>>Top Ten Reasons Why You Want to Participate in the FK-FIC Wars<<

10.  Get to know your fellow list members better (better than you ever
dreamed) and interact with them (send them to jail, kidnap them, dance with
them, share car chases with them, have slumber parties with them...) in a
virtual, clean, non-existent, impersonal War

9.   Meet your faves from FK---write yourself into the loft with Nick, the
morgue with Natalie,  the church with Vachon, the Raven's wine cellar with
Lacroix, the precinct with Tracy... it's as close as Real gets around here!

8.   Force the characters to act out *your* fantasies (within reason)
(well, actually, reason takes a vacation about 24 hours into a War)

7.   Visit the The Happy Souvlaki. Eat at the virtual end in deli's, and
possibly catch Schanke's ghost..

6.   Practice your creative writing/lying skills as you try to get out of
the corners others have painted you into!

5.  Sleep Deprivation! Discover the joys of caffeine overload and REM
withdrawal as you desperately try to keep up with the posts and your writing!

4.  Oh, yeah, spammed mailboxes... there's nothing like coming home to 55
posts in one day! (I'm serious here. It's great stuff)

3.  Acting out your *own* fantasies (want to drink coffee with Nat while
dissecting a corpse? Thumb your nose at Lacroix as you drive by CERK? have
a pillow fight with Nick? Dress up and check out the action at the Raven?
Booby-trap Tracy's computer to say "I'm a good cop"? All possible)

2.  The opportunity to be made a fool of, or to be: kidnapped, brainwashed,
drugged, jailed, seduced, embarassed, mocked, tied up, shot at, and in
general, to be treated as a walking target ("Forever Knight: the only
fandom where assault is a sign of affection" - Susan Garrett)

And the #1 reason to participate in the next War is:

1. Revenge. :) Hey, it's not noble, but it's satisfying.

Christina, vqrw76a@p.......          Merc, O- FoFoD, part-time Valentine
"To dream the impossible dream; to fight the unbeatable foe..."-Don Quixote

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:57:56 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

>>>1.  Two words: Lacroix polkas!
>>
>>Oh, god, I'm in pain!
>
>What's wrong with polka?!?!?

I don't have anything against polka, it's just the thought of Uncle doing a
polka.  It's... it's... I can't describe it.  Too terrifying for words...

%^(=

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:53 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Fanfic list

What are the commands to get onto the fanfic list?  I've tried twice with
the one I found on the web, but both times I was told it doesn't exist.

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:33:11 -0700
From:    Raissa Devereux <1595@e.......>
Subject: Re: Nat as a Vamp

While Nat is mortal, Nick has no incentive to truly become mortal
himself. All he has to do is put Nat on a a pedestal as the local
representative of the perfect state of being. And since, in his mind, he
will always fall short of that perfection, he will never consciously take
steps that may lead to success. If Nat becomes a vamp, on the other hand,
they will both be forced to grow:
1. Nick will embrace the cure, because now he'll have someone to embrace
it with, and they will both have to face their fear of commitment to each
other.
2. Nat will see vampirism through new eyes and not embrace the cure. Nick
will continue looking just to spite her. She has betrayed him. She is not
the angel he thought she was. This means that Nick and Nat won't be
together, but at least they'll be out of the rut they're in now.
3. Nick will have an epiphany. He'll realize that whatever one's physical
state is, life is what a person makes of it. As long as he has love in his
life, he'll be okay. This Beauty & the Beast option is the one I'm hoping
for, but it's the least likely of the three.




Raissa Devereux
raissa@i.......
Nat Vamp Camp

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:18:16 -0500
From:    Apache <lf@c.......>
Subject: Re: Top Ten Reasons to Join the Fic-Wars

On Tue, 20 Feb 1996, MS CHRISTINA L KAMNIKAR wrote:

> 4.  Oh, yeah, spammed mailboxes... there's nothing like coming home to 55
> posts in one day! (I'm serious here. It's great stuff)

        Are you kidding?  SOS-FK produced 200 posts one day, 150
posts several other days, and 100 posts LOTS of times!  War 7 will be a
relief!


Apache

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:32:58 +6
From:    Don Fasig <phase3@g.......>
Subject: List Biz - A Request

Please remember when posting to the list to set your mailer to a line
width of 79 characters or less (personally I use 75).  Some systems have
problems with wider message lines.  At least one system even goes so far
as to generate an error message whenever a wider message is encountered.

Thanks,

Don Fasig, List Janitor
phase3@g.......    ---,-<@

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:33:12 -0500
From:    colin paddock <Claudius@n.......>
Subject: How Many Will Stay On?

ok Guys(and Gals)
        lets pretend that fk is canceled...How many people would stay on the
mailing list...Would there even Be a mailing list? I for one would stay on
the list (If It is still around...)
Cousin Colin

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:41:31 -0800
From:    Wendy Marie Christensen <wendy@i.......>
Subject: Re: How Many Will Stay On?

I would stay on.

Love,                         \|/
Wendy Marie                  |o o|
                   -------ooO~(_)~Ooo------
                  wendy@i.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:29:10 -0800
From:    Elizabeth Ann Lewis <elewis@u.......>
Subject: You might be a KOQTV if...

No, this is not a new faction.  This is a group of real people.  Many of
whom, I suspect, are on this list.  I just realized TPTB haven't put our
dear show in danger... we have!

You might be a Killer Of Quality Telivision if:

1.  You enjoy mulling an episode of your favorite show over, finding new
and interesting things to think about, instead of just one-liners and
dropping bodies (bloody or into bed, same difference).

2.  Beliefs different from your own do not offend you; they instead
challenge you.

3.  You enjoy tracking down (or already know) the poetry and lines from
great literature quoted on your show.

4.  You subscribe to an Internet list (or five) for your show, meaning that
a) you have enough disposable income to afford a computer and b) you are
intelligent enough to know how to run it.

5.  Your show produces a tremendous amount of creative output from both its
creators and viewers.

And of course, the most important:

6.  Every show you watch dies!

I've finally admitted it.  I am (gulp) a KOQTV.  (Highlader people: note
the name begins with a "K", obviously evil).  I don't know why.  All I know
is that every show I love disappears, killed before its time.

So I know now what to do.  I'm just going to have to stop watching TV.
After all, who am I to kill shows for other people?  So I won't watch
television, won't see ads, won't buy the products hawked in those ads....

If they want to kill every show I love, then I will spare them the trouble
and just not love any shows.  So there!

Gee, I must really be a Knightie at heart...  <VBG>

Elizabeth
elewis@u.......***Lizbetann@a.......
Ravenette of the New Order
Knightie/NatPacker/N&N Packer with Cousinly Sympathies
and faint leanings towards Vanquira-ism
"Arnyd yw Ewyll hyd yw"--Passion is the will to be
Listowner, Middle Ages Life
http://members.aol.com/Lizbetann/mypage.html

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:45:19 -0500
From:    Apache <lf@c.......>
Subject: Re: You might be a KOQTV if...

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Elizabeth Ann Lewis wrote:

> You might be a Killer Of Quality Telivision if:
>
> 1.  You enjoy mulling an episode of your favorite show over, finding new
> and interesting things to think about, instead of just one-liners and
> dropping bodies (bloody or into bed, same difference).


        Um... but I enjoy mulling every little thing about FK  AND
I enjoy dropping bodies both bloody  (I mean, they *are* vampires, after
all)  AND into bed  (they are *hot* vampires....)

Apache

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:54:01 -0600
From:    Fire And Life Incarnate <NSHEA4371@a.......>
Subject: Re: How Many Will Stay On?

Date sent:  20-FEB-1996 00:49:23

I just got here and I ain't plannin' on goin' anywhere.
I'm notoriously hard to get rid of, and I've even risen from the dead.
(Just ask those who know me - friends or enemies)

As an aside, I'm having trouble deliberating between the various
factions.  Anybody wanna help me out? (Or in, as the case may be)

Dark Phoenix
Coming Soon to a Galaxy Near You!
NSHEA4371@a.......


------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 01:47:47 -0500
From:    Chana Rossman <chana@b.......>
Subject: Re: <sigh>

>September 25, 1994, LA Times. Executive producer Jon Slan is quoted in an
>article explaining why they chose to take FK into syndication, rather than
>shopping for another network for CBS. He rather specifically states that
>their whole goal was to take the series to 65 episodes, so that it would be
>strippable.

Excuse my stupidity here, but what is meant by the term "strippable"?

Chana

chana@b.......
Help Save "Forever Knight" from cancellation! -- "Just Do It"

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:57:39 -0800
From:    Jerimi Paul <paul9454@u.......>
Subject: Re: How Many Will Stay On?

Being the obsessive person I am, I would probably stay on and continue to
lurk (except for rare venturings into the light. ;)

-Jerimi--->paul9454@u.......

~~~ Ford was beginning to behave rather strangely, or rather not actually
~~~ beginning to behave strangely, but beginning to behave in a way that
~~~ was strangely different from the other strange ways in which he more
~~~ regularly behaved.

On Tue, 20 Feb 1996, colin paddock wrote:

> ok Guys(and Gals)
>         lets pretend that fk is canceled...How many people would stay on the
> mailing list...Would there even Be a mailing list? I for one would stay on
> the list (If It is still around...)
> Cousin Colin
>

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:18:36 -0800
From:    Bonnie Pardoe <bonnie@o.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

>At 11:39 PM 02/19/1996 -0600, you wrote:
>>>1.  Two words: Lacroix polkas!
>>Oh, god, I'm in pain!
>What's wrong with polka?!?!?
>CP

Folks, I think we just found an FoD lurking in our midsts!

Tiger Lily (bonnie@o.......)

But I *like* this new wrinkle in my reality.

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 02:02:25 -0500
From:    "Alora C. Chistiakoff" <acc0924@i.......>
Subject: Re: How Many Will Stay On?

Well, unless I find myself sans computer in the near future (which, since
I am taking some time off school seems to be entirely possible), I am not
going anywhere.

Alora...who is not yet ready to igve up the fight.

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:21:17 -0800
From:    Bonnie Pardoe <bonnie@o.......>
Subject: Re: Top Ten Lists Forever!

>And the number one reason to be a Cousin...
>
>1.  Because if you don't, Uncle will get you.  Now, you don't want that to
>happen, do you?...

Oh, Cousin "Susan" Phoenix, the tighter you squeeze, the more mortals will
slip through your fingers.

Be a rebel.  Do whatever *you* want to do.  Join the Vaqueras.



Tiger Lily (bonnie@o.......)

But I *like* this new wrinkle in my reality.

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:03:44 -0800
From:    wendy lee rios <wlrios@i.......>
Subject: FK Posthumous List

I would stay with the list even if FK gets the Axe!

Cousine Wendy Lee

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:27:20 -0800
From:    Bonnie Pardoe <bonnie@o.......>
Subject: Re: Fanfic list

try:

    subscribe FKFIC-L Susan Schaefer


with nothing in the Subject line and NO signature.  Good luck.

Tiger Lily (bonnie@o.......)

But I *like* this new wrinkle in my reality.

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 02:12:24 -0500
From:    "Alora C. Chistiakoff" <acc0924@i.......>
Subject: Re: Top Ten Reasons to Join the Fic-Wars

On Tue, 20 Feb 1996, MS CHRISTINA L KAMNIKAR wrote:

> 4.  Oh, yeah, spammed mailboxes... there's nothing like coming home to 55
> posts in one day! (I'm serious here. It's great stuff)

Are you kidding me? I check my e-mail every few hours...and tonight (no
more than three hours after I was last on-line) I find 50+ messages...on
top of the 40+ I had earlier this evening...and the 20+ this
afternoon...and the near 20 this morning....

Alora...who needs a bigger mailbox!

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 02:16:19 -0500
From:    colin paddock <Claudius@n.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

At 12:18 AM 02/20/1996 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>>At 11:39 PM 02/19/1996 -0600, you wrote:
>>>>1.  Two words: Lacroix polkas!
>>>Oh, god, I'm in pain!
>>What's wrong with polka?!?!?
>>CP
>
>Folks, I think we just found an FoD lurking in our midsts!
>
>Tiger Lily (bonnie@o.......)


Well, it's not like i like Polka, It's more like i don't not like it.
Besides, Skanke is a good cop...

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:21:13 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Re: Sick of Top Tens yet?

>Folks, I think we just found an FoD lurking in our midsts!

FoD?  I've heard the term before, but refresh my memory...

Cousin "Susan" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 01:23:00 -0600
From:    Susan Schaefer <phoenix@i.......>
Subject: Re: Top Ten Lists Forever!

>Oh, Cousin "Susan" Phoenix, the tighter you squeeze, the more mortals will
>slip through your fingers.

That's why you make sure to krazy glue your hands to them first... :)=

Cousin "S" Phoenix

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 20 Feb 1996 02:22:43 -0500
From:    Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......>
Subject: Re: Top Ten Reasons to Join the Fic-Wars

Christina writes:
>9. Meet your faves from FK...

Hey, *I* didn't *choose* to be in the Raven's wine cellar with LC.
I hate LC.

>8. Force the characters to act out *your* fantasies (within reason)
>9. Acting out your *own* fantasies.

Aren't these pretty similar?  (Still haven't gotten to act out mine
with Nick :( , and after playing in four wars too. :) )

>1. Revenge. :)

But I thought Mercs did it for the *payment*. :)

--Sandra Gray, forever Knightie
--tmp_harkins@d.......

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 19 Feb 1996 02:05:25 -0500
From:    Chana Rossman <chana@b.......>
Subject: Re: How Many Will Stay On?

>        lets pretend that fk is canceled...How many people would stay on the
>mailing list...Would there even Be a mailing list? I for one would stay on
>the list (If It is still around...)
>Cousin Colin

I'll stick around.  If I can't have FK on tv, I'll read about it
in FanFic!

Besides, we Knighties are known for hanging onto our ideals --
even when its not practical.  :-)

Chana

chana@b.......
Help Save "Forever Knight" from cancellation! -- "Just Do It"

------------------------------

End of FORKNI-L Digest - 19 Feb 1996 to 20 Feb 1996 - Special issue
*******************************************************************

Previous digest
Previous
This month's list
This month's list
Next digest
Next






Knight graphics and parchment background created by Melissa Snell and may be found at http://historymedren.about.com/